Hello All,
We are using SRM 7.0 central contract and for pricing we created identical condition types in SRM system and maaped it in calculation schema.
Contract with a base price PB00 works absolutely fine and a backend contract is created witht the same condition type.
This issue arises if I use Z-condition type for e.g. Z123 (here Z123 is defined as a discound condition)
Now when a central contract is created with two condition including discount then two behaviour are observed
Case 1:
In SRM central contract, two condition are being used
PB00 - 1000 USd
R003 - 10% (standard condition)
In backend , the contract has both the condition PB00 as 100 USD and Z123 as 10% . In WE02 this idoc has status 53 ie. processed successfully.(COND_A02 basic type and COND_A message type)
Case 2:
Creaet second central contract two condition are being used
PB00 - 1000 USd
Z123 - 10% (here Z123 is a replica of condition type R003)
In this case, In backend system , the contract is created with only one condition type PB00 as 100 USD the other condition type Z123 is missing although the idoc (COND_A02 basic type and COND_A message type) has status 53 ie. processed successfully.
Please let me know why the system behaves in different manner for both the condition type Z123 an R003, and alsowhy the IDOC status is 53 successfully posted when one of the condition type is not copied to the backend contract.
Has anyone encounter this type of issue, then pelase let me know.
Thanks,
Yatin